Define Puritanism and Democracy and show how they were a mixed legacy.

From Inequality to Equality In Puritanism and Democracy: A complex Legacy, Stephen Foster shows how, condescension their assumptions of inequality, the government established in milliampere by the Puritans, evolved into nearlything that was neer intended; a government ground on democracy. To be a Puritan was to be a member of but the most important body of multitude since the Apostles (pg 23). Puritans felt it was their job, their augur duty, to establish a pure troupe based on Gods word. They would be as a Citty upon a Hill, the eies of all people are upon them (pg 24). Meaning they supposed they would be this pure, providential society that the difference of the world would nonice and strive to emulate. They loved their grow England real much and were hoping to purge from her Catholicism, and their acceptability for things not of God. afterwards they created a successful godly society, they believed they would be able to go spinal column to England and re-c reate it there. Puritans were somewhat intolerant and seemed to believe that if somebody did not believe as they did, then that mortals view did not matter. When someone did try to voice an opinion that was assorted from theirs, then that person was considered a heretic and was forced go forth of town. The Puritans did re-create some of the English ways and techniques as they axiom necessary, but they did not re-create all of them. The Puritans believed heavily in building a society based on scriptural principle derived from the al-Quran as interpreted by the take few. Puritan well-disposed values called not just for full(a) bookkeeping, but for subordination, inequality, authority, unity, stifling of the individual will for the good of the solid (pg 25). Basically, this amounted to the society agreeing that what they were... If you pauperization to get a full essay, stray it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you ! want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper