.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Critique of the Ethical Issue Essay

Every handicraft is subject to several(predicate) respectable considerations. In response, professions present code of stock up on to their employees to guide their behavior in the organization. Formal ethical education is as well as held to engage the employees aw be of different ethical beds. Ethical decision qualification process enable the workforce to handle every ethical upshot and prevents them from making both ethical lapses whatsoever. US health c atomic number 18 system comprises legion(predicate) branches that offer unique health related go to clients. Furthermore the healthc are is split into a hierarchical setup which starts from nursing to the top checkup students. distributively individual related to the US health attending has to undergo a lot of training and education before he/she is authorized to beat all duty. A fundamental part of this coaching involves ethical training which guides the employees panaches and means of dealing with different et hical problems. Conflicts faced by the healthcare are of many types. To start with, physicians fail to work as a team with nurses. Some ages nurses do non understand their roles and issue their duties improperly. Other kinds of conflicts involve patients. These conflicts can usu all toldy become very upright and can even become unlawful in nature. Articulating the ProblemThe ethical conflict that arose in my studies involved a doctor and his patient. open suffered from higher(prenominal) fever and he decided to go to a new doctor, Dr. Bill, as his general physician was out of town on vacation. horn in calculate all his conditions to Dr. Bill. Dr. Bill made some nones and then warned him that he susceptibility be in fear of suffering from typhoid (a severe reverberate of fever). Jimmy was very shocked to hear this. The doctor further added that it would be better for Jimmy to remain in hospital care for at least two days before his condition improved. He also asked him to run some tests which would be needed to clearly diagnose his sickness.When Jimmy heard of the high amount they were charging him, he was highly shocked and remaining the clinic. Jimmy called his physician up and informed him of the entire issue. Dr. Andrew told him to set out a mark off-up from other doctor who was his friend. Jimmy went there and after the checkup, he authoritative another surprise upon hearing that the fever was not serious and hed be perfect in two days. He was given(p) some prescription which he was to take. In two days time, Jimmy perfectly recovered from his fever and, by then, realized how Dr. Bill had act to deceive him into getting the tests and hospital care in arrange to garner more money.The event is, by all means, shocking and unethical. Dr. Bill and those of his the likes of are ruining the sanctity of the medical profession by converting it into any other business profession. It is certainly not unethical to offer your services and expertise to others in return for money. However, intimidating patients by telling them of symptoms which, in fact, they do not possess is certainly very unethical. This trend is right away spreading everywhere, especially online. afterwards doing some research, the author found that there are many health care services which are without delay being offered online.Though some of these setups are highly professional in nature and offer very effective services online, the rest are merely scammers. Whats more problematic is that individuals do not bop how expert the physician is in his/her respective field. Looked at it this way, were all in a big risk whenever we decide to get ourselves canvas up from a new doctor. As far as the scammers are concerned, their deceptive marketing campaigns allure the sick and the injured into asking for help. They make false claims that their products will change their lives or make them better.By the time the poor people find out that theyve been deceived, it is too late to do anything because such institutions and individuals protect themselves through different legislations of the law. Gathering Data After thorough research and data collection, the author has come up with quest important ways of checking the credentials as well as ratings of a physician along with ways of preventing health care frauds. 1. Information rough doctors experience and training is obtained from his office or topical anesthetic medical society in which the doctor is a member. 2.There are some state licensing boards that also issue education about disciplinal actions taken against a particular physician. However, it is not very easy to get information from there. 3. American Medical Associations AMA Physicians Select offers information on training and certification of all the medical and osteopathic physicians who are shortly holding a license in the US. However, disciplinary actions are not included with them. 4. American Board of Medical Specialties ( ABMS) Certified Doctor verification Service can also be utilized to check whether the physician is certified by one or the 24 recognized lastingness boards.The service is free of charge. 5. Googling out for more info is also not a bad idea. You will find several options wherein to check the report/credibility of a physician. 6. There are several government sources which whitethorn be used to obtain information relating to disciplinary action. Of these, the two more or less important sources are the National Practitioner Data Bank and the health care Integrity and Protection Data Bank. 7. Many clinics and hospitals also offer options to check their doctors credentials. However, this is not a good idea because hospitals would never reveal that any one of their doctors is of low quality.Exploring Strategies It is, and so, very fractious to carve a dodge that would clearly identify and tackle the above situation. Practical issues of these kinds are indeed very different from theor etical knowledge that is offered in books. However, following procedures may help prevent such situations in future. From Professions side 1. Establishing a federal committee on healthcare fraud prevention, and having it carry out a detailed wipe-out of all such fraudulent institutions and individuals 2. puzzle out rigorous ethical training program, stressing the consequences of deceiving and holding the truth in the medical profession3. Conducting regular external audits on different health care facilities, with an aim to identify the scammers 4. Publicizing and penalizing doctors who conduct such activities From Patients Perspective 1. Organizing a wide marketing campaign instructing the individuals to be on the alert of such scammers 2. Avoiding new doctors 3. Fixing the medical charges offered at various institutions, so the competition is not price-based but quality based. 4. Having another review with another physician if instructed to undergo very expensive treatment. Impl ementing the StrategyIn order to implement the above discussed strategy, the following needs to be done 1. tump over the event a wide coverage on popular media 2. arrive at mass-awareness through the media 3. Instruct masses to avoid online health care facilities as much as possible unless they know the physician personally. 4. Write to the American Medical Association and other medical authorities, asking them to address the issue on federal level. 5. Increasing word-of-mouth, and making all such frauds humans 6. Conducting nation-wide survey of physicians credentials Evaluating the Outcomes Implementing the above strategy would have the following pros and consPros 1. efficient and appropriate health care only by physicians who have ponderous credentials and ratings 2. Lesser frauds and scams in the health care 3. Better opportunities for physicians whove worked their way up 4. An overall better impact on the health of US nationals 5. Better medical infrastructure Cons 1. High investment is required to manufacture the mass-awareness 2. It is not possible to identify every physician who is conducting fraud 3. It is difficult to decide whether a physician is diagnosing a patient really or not as different physicians come up with different diagnosis measuresREFERENCES Percival, Thomas. Medical ethics. (pp. 4957) from http//books. google. com/books? id=yVUEAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=medical+ethics&as_brr=1&ie=ISO-8859-1PPA52,M1. Walter, Klein (ed). The Story of Bioethics From seminal works to contemporary explorations Jordan, M. C. (1998). Ethics manual. Fourth edition. American College of Physicians (pp. 23-30) Beauchamp, Tom L. , Childress, James F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York Oxford University Press. Margaret A. Burkhardt, Alvita Nathaniel (2007) Ethics and Issues in modern Nursing

No comments:

Post a Comment