Case study Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Case Study ExampleQuestion 8What did Rein A J regard in an eBay auction off as the equivalent of the fall of the hammer in a tralatitious auction and what is the significance of each (2 marks)The fall of the hammer in a traditional auction is complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer or in other customary manner-and until any such announcement is make any bidder may retract his or her bid. The equivalent of the fall of the hammer in an eBay auction is the automatic close of bidding at a unbending time and the generation of an eBay advice headed won appear to have been accepted by the parties to an eBay auction.Question 9Why was an order for specific performance of the contract clutch in this case(2 marks)An order for specific performance of the contract was appropriate because of two reasons 1) the Wirraway was not at the time in flying condition, and 2) the unwavering was in a hangar owned by a third party.Question 10Why was the final order not made in this perceive (1 mark)It was ruled that a binding contract was formed between the plaintiff3 and the defendant4 and that it should be specifically enforced.5 Further, the two parties would be given a chance to reach obligation on the precise nature of the agreement.Question 11Why was the matter heard in the sovereign Court (4 marks)This matter was heard in the Supreme Court because the defendant kept appealing to higher courts when the decisions in lower courts were against him (i.e., not in his favour). TOTAL 30 MarksCourse Profile for LAWS11030, 2009 bound Two - Page 7Part BMcMuffins Ltd is a fast food company. Yesterday, before reverse had started, an argument arose between three kitchen hands Tom, tool and Harry. Over the weekend, Tom had offered to sell his... An order for specific performance of the contract was appropriate because of two reasons 1) the Wirraway was not at the time in flying condition, and 2) the plane was in a hangar owned by a third party.I t was ruled that a binding contract was formed between the plaintiff3 and the defendant4 and that it should be specifically enforced.5 Further, the two parties would be given a chance to reach agreement on the precise nature of the agreement.McMuffins Ltd is a fast food company. Yesterday, before work had started, an argument arose between three kitchen hands Tom, Dick and Harry. Over the weekend, Tom had offered to sell his motorbike to Dick for $5000. Dick said this was far too overmuch scarcely he would pay $4000. Tom refused. Before Tom left for work this morning Dick phoned to say he would buy the motorbike for $5000 but Tom said he had already sold it to Harry for $4,500.It was not a good day for Dick he was one of the six employees of McMuffins Ltd that